Ruin Their Crops on the Ground: The Politics of Food in the United States, from the Trail of Tears to School Lunch

Andrea Freeman

Winner of the Los Angeles Times Book Prize in History Winner of the James Beard Media Award in Food Issues and Advocacy The first and definitive history of the use of food in United States law and politics as a weapon of conquest and control, a Fast Food Nation for the Black Lives Matter era In 1779, to subjugate Indigenous nations, George Washington ordered his troops to “ruin their crops now in the ground and prevent their planting more.” Destroying harvests is just one way that the United States has used food as a political tool. Trying to prevent enslaved people from rising up, enslavers restricted their consumption, providing only enough to fuel labor. Since the Great Depression, school lunches have served as dumping grounds for unwanted agricultural surpluses. From frybread to government cheese, Ruin Their Crops on the Ground draws on over fifteen years of research to argue that U.S. food law and policy have created and maintained racial and social inequality. In an epic, sweeping account, Andrea Freeman, who pioneered the term “food oppression,” moves from colonization to slavery to the Americanization of immigrant food culture, to the commodities supplied to Native reservations, to milk as a symbol of white supremacy.

ScienceScience · medium confidenceScience61 signalsPolitics & Government51 signalsGoogle Books: Political Science -> ScienceGoogle Books: Political Science -> Politics & GovernmentKeyword Classifier: American History -> American HistoryCivil Rights & Racial JusticeImmigration, Refugees & BorderlandsIndigenous HistorySlavery & Emancipation
Experimental book profileGenerated by GPT-5.4 nano · may contain inaccuracies

This is an unverified interpretation of the catalog description, offered as an opt-in discovery experiment—not as bibliographic fact.

  1. 01 Central figures

    None extracted with sufficient confidence.

    These suggestions did not meet the normal display threshold and are more likely to be wrong.

    • George Washington62%
  2. 02 Central places

    None extracted with sufficient confidence.

  3. 03 Suggested argument

    U.S. food law and policy have created and maintained racial and social inequality by using food as a weapon of conquest and control.

    Model confidence 86%

  4. 04 Reading orientation

    55 / 100 academic

    Trade / academic crossover

    An estimate of intended readership and scholarly apparatus—not quality or importance.

Confidence percentages are the model's own estimates. Profile confidence: 66%.