Magus: The Art of Magic from Faustus to Agrippa

Anthony Grafton

A revelatory new account of the magus—the learned magician—and his place in the intellectual, social, and cultural world of Renaissance Europe. In literary legend, Faustus is the quintessential occult personality of early modern Europe. The historical Faustus, however, was something quite different: a magus—a learned magician fully embedded in the scholarly currents and public life of the Renaissance. And he was hardly the only one. Anthony Grafton argues that the magus in sixteenth-century Europe was a distinctive intellectual type, both different from and indebted to medieval counterparts as well as contemporaries like the engineer, the artist, the Christian humanist, and the religious reformer. Alongside these better-known figures, the magus had a transformative impact on his social world.

HistoryWorld History · medium confidenceWorld History81 signalsLlm Classifier: World History -> World HistoryKeyword Classifier: Arts & Criticism -> Arts & CriticismTopic Classifier: Art, Music & Performance -> Arts & CriticismArt, Music & PerformanceEssays & Cultural CriticismReligion & Religious MovementsTravel, Exploration & Place
Experimental book profileGenerated by GPT-5.4 nano · may contain inaccuracies

This is an unverified interpretation of the catalog description, offered as an opt-in discovery experiment—not as bibliographic fact.

  1. 01 Central figures

    None extracted with sufficient confidence.

    These suggestions did not meet the normal display threshold and are more likely to be wrong.

    • Faustus62%
    • Agrippa38%
  2. 02 Central places

    None extracted with sufficient confidence.

  3. 03 Suggested argument

    In sixteenth-century Europe, the magus was a distinctive intellectual type, unlike medieval counterparts yet linked to them, and his presence transformed social life.

    Model confidence 74%

  4. 04 Reading orientation

    70 / 100 academic

    Academic

    An estimate of intended readership and scholarly apparatus—not quality or importance.

Confidence percentages are the model's own estimates. Profile confidence: 66%.