House of Debt: How They (and You) Caused the Great Recession, and How We Can Prevent It from Happening Again

Atif Mian, Amir Sufi

Though the banking crisis captured the public's attention, Mian and Sufi argue strongly that current policy is too heavily biased toward protecting banks and creditors. Increasing the flow of credit is disastrously counterproductive when the fundamental problem is too much debt. Excessive household debt leads to foreclosures, causing individuals to spend less and save more. Less spending means less demand for goods, followed by declines in production and huge job losses. How do we end such a cycle? With a direct attack on debt.

Business & EconomicsBusiness & Economics · medium confidenceBusiness & Economics81 signalsLlm Classifier: Business & Economics -> Business & EconomicsOpen Library: History -> HistoryAward Category: FT Business Book of the Year -> Business & EconomicsBusiness, Capitalism & Corporations
Experimental book profileGenerated by GPT-5.4 nano · may contain inaccuracies

This is an unverified interpretation of the catalog description, offered as an opt-in discovery experiment—not as bibliographic fact.

  1. 01 Central figures

    None extracted with sufficient confidence.

    These suggestions did not meet the normal display threshold and are more likely to be wrong.

    • Mian and Sufi40%
  2. 02 Central places

    None extracted with sufficient confidence.

  3. 03 Suggested argument

    Current policy is overly focused on protecting banks and creditors, and increasing credit is counterproductive because excessive debt leads to foreclosures, reduced spending, lower demand, production declines, and major job losses—so debt must be directly attacked.

    Model confidence 68%

  4. 04 Reading orientation

    55 / 100 academic

    Trade / academic crossover

    An estimate of intended readership and scholarly apparatus—not quality or importance.

Confidence percentages are the model's own estimates. Profile confidence: 62%.