Cadillac Desert: The American West and its Disappearing Water
Marc Reisner
"Beautifully written and meticulously researched."—St. Louis Post-Dispatch. This updated study of the economics, politics, and ecology of water covers more than a century of public and private desert reclamation in the American West. At its core, this book is a history of the massive engineering projects—dams, aqueducts, and diversions—that allowed the arid American West to bloom into a collection of major cities and agricultural hubs. It frames the development of the West not as a triumph of nature, but as a triumph of political maneuvering and federal spending. Why It Stands Out The "Money Flows Uphill" Thesis: Reisner famously argues that in the West, water doesn't follow the laws of physics; it follows the laws of money and power. He exposes how bureaucratic rivalries between the Bureau of Reclamation and the Army Corps of Engineers led to "pork-barrel" projects that were often economically irrational but politically unstoppable. Narrative Style: Unlike many dry academic texts on water law, Reisner writes with the pace of a political thriller. He paints vivid portraits of the "water titans"—the ambitious, often ruthless men who redirected entire rivers to create empires in the desert.
Award History
0 wins · 1 total
| Award | Year | Result | Category / Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Book Critics Circle Award for NonfictionMajor | 1986 | Finalist | Secondary source |
Experimental book profileGenerated by GPT-5.4 nano · may contain inaccuracies
This is an unverified interpretation of the catalog description, offered as an opt-in discovery experiment—not as bibliographic fact.
01 Central figures
None extracted with sufficient confidence.
02 Central places
- American West75%
03 Suggested argument
The development of the arid American West’s water systems is best understood as driven by money, power, and political maneuvering, producing large engineering projects that were often economically irrational but politically unstoppable.
Model confidence 65%
04 Reading orientation
55 / 100 academicTrade / academic crossover
An estimate of intended readership and scholarly apparatus—not quality or importance.
Confidence percentages are the model's own estimates. Profile confidence: 72%.